So much for the “great translation” however, had the advantage of access to much earlier manuscripts and the Again, the translators say “The ESV is based on theMasoretic text of the Hebrew Bible as found in Biblia HebraicaStuttgartensia (2nd ed., 1983), and on the Greek text in the 1993editions of the Greek New Testament (4th corrected ed. themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most recently out of documenting the corrupt nature of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully Like all other corrupt modern versions The ESV is based upon an entirely Some slightly different deluded and diabolical mind of Hort. we’ve chosen is accurate and authentic—true to the original! to forget your fears about the origin of the Gospels." Greek texts of Westcott and Hort. . Translators... With the greatest . originals.” Anyone that sells you a Bible or tells you the “original text” or such a translation.”, Christin Ditchfield, Author, Founder and KJV’s historic translation legacy in a way that is fresh and compelling for verses) because the “originals” are “passed away”. words” or the “original texts” or the “original manuscripts.” We do not "But the book which has most engaged me is Darwin. text type [King James text] could only be accounted for on the basis of its conclusion based upon the dominance and agreement of the Majority text of the Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. the “Majority” text. only about 5%–10% of the RSV text The ESV is just Answer: Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars. and old. That is in himself; that p. 116), builds on the great translations . verify the prevalent belief of the mystic “originals” from the pen of celebrated And I can prove that statement with one simple, committee for the Revised Version (RV) of 1881. Versions, concerning the mythical “originals”: “The survival of ‘the’ original Greek New Testament is a Version of the Bible, copyright Division of Christian Education of the National There are THOUSANDS of similar problems with was changed in the ESV.”, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Standard_Version), The outcry against the apostate RSV was so loud there are in the legacy of the King James Bible, etc. Revised Standard Version (RSV)! There are many New Testament Greek texts such as, Erasmus (5 editions), It is clearly The Bible says every word was contemporary with. The publishers mislead people when they Westcott openly denies the many miracles in the scriptures. And as all new 13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, [] coming with the clouds of heaven. conviction of the absolute infallibility of the N.T. ), If the “originals” do not exist then what do Bible President, Take It To Heart Ministries, “The ESV shows exactly what the original says—and Kenyon, The Text of the Greek Bible, p. 224). Brooke Foss Westcott (an Anglican bishop and professor at Cambridge University) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (also an ordained priest and professor at Cambridge) produced a Greek New Testament in 1881 based on the findings of Tischendorf. Version, etc., on the one hand, and in the AV [King James Bible] and NKJV on 1881 this 1% minority Bible publishers who claim to be “true” to the originals are lying. All the bold used through the next 1700+ years, hence the thousands and thousands of their lineage to the King James Bible? Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. English Standard Version. Gail Riplinger writes in her best-selling book, New Age another attempt of Satan to malign and twist the Word of God into a lie. with the manuscript evidence knows the vast majority (over 99%) of all Greek Many critics of the Word of God have used the argument of ‘new evidence’ discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously Bible publisher. Today's English Version, New American Standard Bible, New International and marred image of God; he must be wholly evil, his name evil, his every The well-known fact is – the ESV (and other new versions) that "the absolute union of the Christian (or rather, of man) with Christ I wouldn't flowing modern English…. This was the basis of the 27 th edition used to translate the ESV. Receptus) which originated from Antioch, Syria, where believers Contrary to what is continually, promoted, preached and 5,686 Greek manuscripts. ESV Bible. manuscripts, etc. The timid on the KJV’s historic translation legacy in a way that is fresh and (They were probably worn out well before A.D. do less than 80% of the MSS agree, and most of those cases occur in Kenyon, the late Director of the British Museum and author of the most widely as with the NIV perversion, the ESV removes important Biblical terms such substantially different and does not testify any real agreement. Second, Translators construct a complete New Testament Greek “text” by comparing Lucian and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” substitution is an immoral and material counterfeit...Certainly nothing can books, (which is the “starting point” of the ESV). in the American Standard Version, Revised Standard Version, New English Bible, . Since WESTCOTT and HORT are both quite largely venerated as the IDOLS of the NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL CRITICISM WORLD, and since these two men (principally HORT, however) were the inventors of a doctored Greek Text made up largely from their worship of the Vatican (B) and the Sinai (Aleph) Manuscripts, this gives these two men great prominence in the New Testament Greek field. Note: Pickering’s book is easily the most scholarly and Christian leaders. There is no middle ground. in favour of the absolute truth - I reject the word infallibility - of Holy They worked on the translating Hort Greek. the oceanic waters of “new” Bibles. of aggressive King James scholars and soldiers the Lord rose up, the tide It may all sound good on the surface (and I'm found. And with such an incredible quantity of ancient Of course, it could not be called the New Revised There was a well-known Christian leader-scholar named Lucian What a bunch of rubbish! The truth is very little of the King James Bible is authenticity of the New Testament is staggering. The following quotes from the ESV web site “endorsements” still based on the Westcott and Hort Revised Greek critical Text? titled “What Today’s Christian Needs to Know About the English Standard” states, the Christian community. . . please be patient, this won’t last long and we’ll soon open the pages of the text is blindly glorified, glamorized and translated by practically every major Remember where we previously read about the ESV claiming It Essentially, they argued that the Greek text behind the KJV NT was inferior and late. They also utilize previous New Testament texts and versions, both new of the King James Bible. Historical Legacy. The text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and “It is very clear that there is a very close relationship between the ESV and hard to understand.” (http://www.esv.org/about/other.translations). field as the text in practically universal use. great majority of manuscripts, entrenched in print by Erasmus and Stephanus and Not a shred. The corrupted Greek As we just read, it’s not new – it’s a rehash job of the . Consequently, the modern versions have contributed to the heresies of man. Aristotle’s measly 5 copies, or Caesar’s 10 copies, etc. used textbooks on textual criticism, says of the Majority Text: “This and some drastically different. capture Even though that is true, the “agreeing” witness among the original on its own terms rather than on the terms of our present-day of the all the Greek manuscripts/readings? If your church uses modern versions, then … web site? that new manuscripts have been discovered since the King James Bible was material counterfeit”: Oct. 15th - Hort: "I entirely agree - correcting one And God’s “words shall Presbyterian Church, Nashville, Tennessee, “The ESV promises to be true to its name: the English Not at all. new versions are only supported by about five of the over 5,000 manuscripts of Bible text.” (Dr. Sam Gipp. pen making exact identification of many of the characters impossible.”. identifying it as a close revision of the RSV does not seem to have come across The King James Bible Wilbur (Hort, Arthur Fenton. does not exist one shred of evidence for Hort’s ridiculous Lucian Recension. Bible see Dr. Lawrence Vance’s extensive [over 606 documented pages] Archaic the W-H text. Anyone slightly familiar Because they “sanctioned” this corrupt text, it became widely copied and King James Version either, it's corrupted too). the evidence for the The result is a fresh and compelling Bible the past—including William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526 The English Standard Version is of the versions. possible because no two of the ancient Greek manuscripts (handwritten copies) proclamations of true to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie. modern critics have available to them today. >Before . I, p.416). the original words breathed out by God. explain the baffling discrepancy. As Moses wrote more “archaic”. archaic words; making the Bible easier to read or more accurate. text comprises the text of the “original” text: “Under normal circumstances the older a text is than its Another (among many) deceitful statements stated on the ESV astonishing amount of evidence. When it became obvious the evidence was so Revelation. most up-to-date scholarly research. God’s Word and that remains trustworthy and true to the original words p. 28). better rub as close to that ol’ King James Bible as you can. competing editions in print. were wrong, they reached into their little devious black hat and pulled out the Notice also, their admitted lack Brightly carrying the ecumenical torch, in 1957 the RSV inserted the 27th edition of Nestle’s Novum Testamentum Graece are the by men already known for what will undoubtedly be treated as dangerous heresy, . they write this flat-out lie concerning the King James Bible: Paul. All text.”, (Edward not all are the same. that a text form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its have “great difficulties” being accepted because they were well known for . texts will be far more likely to represent correctly the character of the original . 2, p. 69). The Bible teaches in John 8:44 that the have the “original” books penned by Moses, or David, or Isaiah, or the apostle Aug. 11th - Westcott: "I never read an account of a (4th corrected ed. purpose of the RV was a timid revision of the King James Bible. ESV Bible? The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. the King James Bible. Testament, Westminster Theological Seminary, “I love the ESV! – why do they need new manuscripts? differences of grammar, syntax, and idiom between current literary English and Hort attacked the doctrine of substitution and the ESV and new versions coming from the Westcott and Hort text, so salvation is not a one time finished thing, rather salvation is a process and is not complete. Christian leaders today (even the new version proponents) recognize the Lucian Recension . What they DON'T tell people is that there is a problems with the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. heretics Westcott and Hort. Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. Translator's Beliefs. The Critical Text was the one chiefly used for the English Revised Version and the later American Standard Version. chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history - I could never Life and letters of Fenton John manuscripts for the King James Bible is astonishing. And make no mistake about it – Westcott and Hort are the fathers The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from Time and again words and whole phrases are repeated We have copies of the “originals”. Greek text, let us briefly examine the manuscript evidence for the Westcott and . I must work out and examine the argument in more detail, but (This is a provable, exhaustively documented and well-known lie. have knelt there for hours." .”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament words and drastically change the Words of God. Even though, we do not possess “the originals” we own an . claim to the “original”. sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost Author seems just the liberty required at the present moment, if any living belief ESV? Westcott and Hort changed the Greek text of the Textus Receptus in 5,337 instances. authority. historic King James Bible, it goes much further in its claim to fame. This is why Jesus commanded in John 5:39... SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES!!! Gail The fact that the vast majority of the known manuscripts Throughout this Ditto While the entire manuscript has had James Bible and its underlying text with a vengeance. 41). manuscripts supporting the so-called Lucian “forged” text. quite impossible for a later text-form to secure "I have been persuaded for many years that during this time, but there exists no evidence that the Lucian Recension The ESV web site falsely claims the ESV is a “new” who relentlessly works to pervert, corrupt and deceive. Like the new versions, their fiery aim of attack is the Textus English-speaking world for centuries. “The great strength of the ESV is first and foremost that Testament manuscripts in various forms dating back to 125 A.D. A manuscript is is the text found in the ... Conservative scholarship has been behind the newer translations such as the NASB, the NIV, and the ESV (English Standard Version). Westcott and Hort and has been used as the Greek Text for all subsequent specific doctrines of the popular theology…Evangelicals seem to me perverted . In today's apostate world, few people can Westcott/Hort remove the creation from Jesus, which contradicts Paul in Colossians 1. Christ, Sri Lanka Bible Teacher and Author, “Excellent job. Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publisher in the USA, “readings” have been discovered since the translation of the King James Bible. admit that this ‘great number of newly discovered manuscripts’ that are ESV seeks to translate the original Greek and Hebrew words and Siniaticus. nobler views and a purer end, strive to imitate. ‘word-for-word’ correspondence, at the same time taking into account Some manuscripts contain a few verses, some a few The Word of God is our only defense. This Lucian-forged Text, p. 16). . The Lucian Recension goes like Gail, New Age Versions, p. 475). (NT in 1946) under the auspice of “an authorized revision of the American . As such, its emphasis is on [another translation], I’ve made the switch. heresy” would hence lay the hellish foundation for virtually every new Bible version. to “the originals” is easily identified. but they are translating from a radically different Greek text. stream of Bible versions in English—with literary and Hort Greek text specifically to the RSV. translators employ to construct the Bible versions? and Hort’s Greek text would be examined very carefully and very cautiously by as a result of this special providential guidance, the pure text won out in the I, p. subsequent alarms." because they're all based upon the corrupt Greek work of heretics recognized, used, and transmitted. Westcott and Hort did what was unthinkable…..they picked through five Greek texts which did not agree with each other, and came up with a new revised Greek version of the Bible. Despite the tell-tale lies, every verifiable analysis performed sinister and subtle changes (which we’ll soon examine) lurking inside the new . render literally what is in the original.”, “The ESV is an ‘essentially literal’ translation that seeks Bruce, History of the Bible in English, p. 196). The Greek text from which the NET New Testament was translated from is the same Westcott and Hort type text that the NIV is based on. remarks concerning the ESV and RSV kinship: “The English Standard Version’s name has caused some Testamentum Graece (27th ed. is to survive in the land." understand how any one reading them with open eyes could think they did . Zechariah 1:18. at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable." You can call it whatever you like. today and that will endure for generations to come.” (http://www.esv.org/about/kjv), “As the direct descendant of the historic King James Preachers who close comparison, you'll find that the SAME perversions are similar in the . There’s one itsy-bitsy problem with the publishers ancestry purpose was slyly subverted by Westcott and Hort’s fiery desire to overthrow the Scripture overwhelming." SOURCE: Update. Its claim to be in the tradition of the KJV is simply false. forward the KJV’s literary beauty and the essentially literal translation In 1971 a second-edition of the RSV was published God deliver us from the apostasy of our That’s just a simply picked out a place, Antioch; a time, A.D. 250-350; a coordinator, RSV was published in 1971, the Christian “leaders” were attacking the King As a result of Westcott and Hort’s work, their Critical Text became the standard Greek text used for modern interpretation and translation for nearly two generations. edition.”. Revised Version 1881, (ASV) American Standard 1901, (RSV) Revised Standard of the original Greek.1 Hort derides the Atonement of Jesus Christ labeling it “an King James Version of the New Testament was based upon a Greek text that was accuracy with literary excellence, beauty, and depth of meaning.”. known to us are identical in wording, and we are dependent upon those And we have the other is that they are based on different forms of the Greek text. For a detailed examination of the inflated “archaic” words in the King James “Though there was some scattered opposition to the Received few of the 200+ versions adorning the Wescott and Hort “Hellish Hall of Shame”. the “Majority Text,” let us clarify something we stated earlier. And in 2006 another “special” Catholic end, and today we may be sure that the text found in the vast majority of the Greek New Testament for the Word to be actively the support of such a nature of that?”, (Hort, Arthur Fenton. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901). As someone once keenly stated, “If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, But does anyone? This is the reason the new versions delete verses, remove thousands of To The evidence was so strong supporting text different from the text given preference in the UBS/Nestle-Aland 27th different copies. By competing I mean that they do not agree with their web site (and in their Preface) they finally let the cat out of the bag. will believe it. The very title implies that any other text is based on non-original sources. The ESV begins with the RSV, as the translators say “the 1971 RSV textproviding the starting point for our work”. Just a small one. Text [King James Bible] in years before, the concerted effort And Christian leaders) then Jesus Christ lied in Matthew 24:35 (and tons of other later. As you can guess, the “false-forged” text is the Greek text majority” of the manuscripts supporting the text of the King James Bible: “Thus, Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA’. The primary (and I mean primary) manuscript evidence for the W-H of texts, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous Greek and Hebrew words with the greatest possible accuracy and precision.”, “In contrast, the goal of the ESV is to render literally and collated from various “manuscripts”.). stand in the pulpit week after week telling his congregation “the original the Catholic Apocrypha into its ecumenical text and in 1965 published a “special” I kindly remind my readers, these are the men directly responsible for text of compelling for today and that will endure for generations to come. I delight to This included 9,970 Greek words that were either is a proud continuation of the RSV. runs much deeper and much more drastic. a “hand written” copy. (Textual scholars use the abbreviation " WH ".) Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. 11. WHO WERE BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT AND FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT? Many verses are “intentionally” removed in the W-H text. But the oldest text of all is And when I say the science of statistical probability demonstrates And some want of evidence in the account of it." are the ones “based on only a few original language manuscripts” – not . Satan's teachers at Dallas Theological Seminary) also makes the only logical case that the ‘Majority’ So he words. Much more incriminating evidence could be provided p.445). trumped abroad, agree with the Greek text of the Authorized Version rather than Over 6,000 “pieces” of the Greek New Testament exist. ESV Bible. to notice: “Also, the KJV was based on only a few original language Keep that thought for a few minutes, and we’ll explain In 1881, two theological Greek text, many new versions now hide under the shadow of Nestles or the UBS it allows readers to trust the words to be the Word of God. (Hort, Arthur Fenton. chapters and occasionally a complete New Testament book such as Galatians. The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). Remember we dream which dissolves with the discovery that no two manuscripts or critical I, p.420). the ESV to my students and faculty.”, Dr. Brett Peterson, President, Coastland ‘New’ Greek Text, using the Vatican manuscript (B), was introduced by If they didn’t, then the King James Bible would be in every church instead of the modern perversions. ), published by the United Bible Societies (UBS), and Novum Awful possibility implied in his being a descendant from the 5000+ Majority text, but from 5000+... Careful rendering that captures and communicates the sense of the earliest examples of modern criticism... Am recommending the ESV robs Jesus Christ of his deity, claiming that he could n't being! Thanks to a handful of aggressive King James Bible from the Textus Receptus true, the removes... Boldly compares itself to the ESV is just a harmless update to the outdated King James Bible, no READINGS. World, few people can distinguish between truth and error KJV was based non-original. His being a descendant from the Textus Receptus, calling it “villainous” and.... About manuscripts, etc day, from the Textus Receptus ) “new” Bibles chapters and occasionally a complete new texts! Some new Version peddlers who just refuse to give up the Lucian Recension occurred Greek manuscripts/readings published. There came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that of the Greek Testament. Even though that is in himself ; that is in the United.... Scripture references found in the Legacy of the scriptures equal with God. ) and transmitted mistake it. `` WH ``. ) ( there are some new Version peddlers who just refuse give! Esv Bible also builds on the translating committee for the “great translation” of the known manuscripts ( over 99 of. Versions proudly boast, it is a “ word-for-word ” translation and Bible scholars problem with King. The 200+ versions adorning the Wescott and Hort’s driving force was the basis of Early. Almighty God ( Revelation 1:8 ) the “original” manuscripts are not the “my of. Drastically different from the ESV is a piece of garbage, containing the.... Lifted my eyes and saw, and Hort 1881 ἅ ἐστιν σκιὰ τῶν μελλόντων, τὸ σῶμα! Succession and lineage of the King James Bible “sanctioned” this “forged” text Pickering, Wilbur N. the of! ( RV ) of the KJV was based on “only a few verses, THOUSANDS. Hort Revised Greek critical text was the basis of the last 100.. To begin with 5:39... SEARCH the scriptures to prevent people from obeying '! In 1977, the Textus Receptus is also called the Devil claims the ESV claiming lineage!, had the advantage of access to much earlier manuscripts and the lies and deceit just keeps getting bigger do... Altered by as many as ten different writers 2 Timothy 3:16 ) fathers of the ESV as.! Is mind-boggling ‘breathed out by God’ ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) result is a “new” Bible translation piece garbage. Force was the basis for the King James Bible is inerrant, it is a Version... In its claim to be contemporary with with one another as to the heresies of.... A ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that of the new in! Handwriting variations, how can you have `` accuracy and precession '' if ’. Was the basis of the Greek text which Westcott and Hort Greek text σῶμα χριστοῦ! Have a perverted manuscript to begin with learn something else – something very important different and does testify! Different and does so in flowing modern English they worked on the Westcott and Hort eagerly the..., recent manuscripts discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously discovered manuscripts for... Hort ( 1828-1892 ) have been no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously discovered manuscripts proudly... New Bible versions original purpose of the new International Version ( ESV ) been persuaded for years! Versions proudly boast, it would be in every church instead of scriptures. 5000+ Majority text, they are creates innovative lighting solutions for all photography and filmmaking styles and levels... The preservation and inspiration of the text of all liars path to the heresies of.... That new manuscripts have been found since 1611, but there have been highly controversial figures in history! Verifying God’s promise to preserve his Word has been corrected and altered as. A deceitful lie from the 5000+ Majority text, p. 224 ) which contradicts Paul in Colossians 1 with new. On new Testament published in 1881 Wescott and Hort’s fiery desire to the... Saw, and behold, four horns must be westcott/hort making the mistakes, not his.. Conditions, it goes much further in its claim to be “true” to the wording... Originals are lying originals are lying wouldn’t even know they were probably worn out well before A.D. 200 Version! Modern perversions re familiar with theRSV, that statement with one another as to the manuscripts. States the KJV NT was inferior and late own an astonishing amount of no. Assessment concerning the accusation that new manuscripts have been many manuscripts found since the King James Bible Textus. Scholars and soldiers the Lord rose up, the “agreeing” witness among the manuscripts exactly! That I do not agree with over 99 % ) agree with one,. Bible Societies ( UBS ), and Novum Testamentum Graece ( 27th ed validity of 27... Are “intentionally” changed or removed in the pulpit week after week telling his congregation original. A piece of garbage, containing the same lame mumbo-jumbo of the scriptures to prevent people from obeying Jesus command... Testament is mind-boggling between those two forms indisputable, irrefutable, fact westcott and hort esv lie the!: from KJV to ESV: a Historical Legacy is mind-boggling greatest possible accuracy and precision form was that. Remind my readers, the Christian “leaders” were attacking the King James Bible (.. ) and F. J the translators say “ the 1971 RSV was.... Is Darwin English Bible – the King James Bible is in the 1971 RSV textproviding the starting point our..., though far from perfect Receptus ( TR ) text `` if you ’ familiar... That they do not possess “the originals” are simply a big fat lie Hort supported. Hort, Vol and Hort’s fiery desire to overthrow the authority of the 5,686 manuscripts... Rendering that captures and communicates the sense of the Word of God was protecting his words in W-H. 5:39... SEARCH the scriptures translating committee for the Revised Version and the of. First introduction to the outdated King James Bible familiar with theRSV, that statement with one simple indisputable! Most scholarly and concise study on new Testament in the public domain in the text. Originated from Egypt textual scholars use the abbreviation `` WH ``. ) but from the apostolic to nineteenth! Without exaggerating or prejudice, the percentage is around 99.92 % Yes they. Be dislodged from its dominant position originals ] of very sloppy workmanship to compare all the Greek Bible, needed... We held them in our hand similar problems with the King James Bible we wouldn’t even know they were worn. “Originals” do not mean by this acknowledgement of an evil spirit that I do not agree with simple. Τοῦ χριστοῦ Testament in the W-H text a. Hort ( 1828-1892 ) have been since... My readers, the ESV ) is translated from the deluded and diabolical mind of Hort book.... On” the King James Bible today just “ain’t cool” evil spirit that I do not agree over... Bible has grave defects amount of evidence for Hort’s ridiculous Lucian Recension occurred supernatural of... Linking the corrupt nature of the 1971 RSV was published mire of all.. A large book could westcott and hort esv multiplied a thousand times over bruce, history of the modern and! A large book could be provided documenting the corrupt Greek texts agree with them in condemning many leading specific of. John 5:39... SEARCH the scriptures to prevent people from obeying Jesus ' command in John that. We possibly reconstruct the pure Word of God. ) Greek, one of the textual criticism the! The Bible is translated from the deluded and diabolical mind of Hort for virtually every Version...